An Ecosystem Model of Islamic Character Development: A Qualitative Case Study of Integrated Religious Strategies in a Rural Indonesian Madrasah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35719/adabiyah.v7i2.1363Keywords:
Islamic character development, ecosystem model, integrated religious strategies, rural madrasah, qualitative case studyAbstract
This study aims to develop an ecosystem model of Islamic character development by examining how integrated religious strategies operate within a rural Indonesian madrasah. It specifically investigates how affective role modeling, Islamic-based reinforcement, and contextual value integration interact to shape students’ moral and spiritual formation. The study addresses a gap in the existing literature, which often treats religious programs as isolated activities rather than as interconnected institutional systems. A qualitative single case study design was employed at MTs Diponegoro Japah in Blora Regency, Central Java. Data were collected through prolonged school observations, semi-structured interviews with seven key informants, and document analysis of institutional records. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify patterns across data sources, supported by triangulation and member checking to ensure credibility and trustworthiness. The findings indicate that Islamic character development functions as a dynamic ecosystem composed of three mutually reinforcing pillars: affective teacher–student relationships, structured but gradually internalized reward mechanisms, and the integration of moral values into authentic daily contexts. These strategies collectively foster sustained behavioral improvement despite socio-economic and infrastructural constraints. The novelty of this study lies in conceptualizing religious character education as an institutional ecosystem rather than a set of discrete programs. The study contributes theoretically by refining models of Islamic character formation and practically by offering context-sensitive guidance for rural madrasahs seeking sustainable and adaptive character education strategies.
References
Aida, A. N. (2024). Peran pesantren dalam menghadapi perkembangan teknologi (Studi kasus di Pondok Pesantren Nurul Hidayah, Kota Semarang). [Nama Jurnal], 4(2), 155–162.
Association, B. E. R. (2024). Ethical guidelines for educational research. British Educational Research Association.
Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2005). What works in character education? Journal of Research in Character Education, 3(1), 1–16.
Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. Basic Books.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2022). Research methods in education (9th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
Elva, H. Y., & Murhayati, S. (2025). Penelitian studi kasus kualitatif. [Nama Jurnal], 9, 13087–13098.
Fadlilah, N. (2023). Integrasi dimensi kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik dalam pembinaan akhlak siswa. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(1), 77–92.
Fauzi, I., Novita Sari, D., & Junaidi, M. (2024). Pengembangan budaya religius pada pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di sekolah. Tarbiyatuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 17(1).
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.
Hasanah, N. (2024). Ekosistem strategi keagamaan dalam madrasah: Pendekatan terpadu pembinaan karakter. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 10(1), 1–18.
Hofsawati, N., & Fauzi, I. (2025). Analisis kompetensi sosial guru terhadap pembentukan karakter siswa di SD/MI: Kajian literatur kualitatif. Journal on Education, 8(2), 149–156.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam Books.
Mahmud, M. (2022). Strategi pembinaan akhlak siswa melalui program keagamaan di madrasah tsanawiyah. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 45–60.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2021). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–13.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Ritonga, M., Lusida, N., & [Author Unclear]. (2024). Metode keteladanan sebagai pondasi pendidikan Islam. Educendikia, April, 143–151.
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529.
Rohim, A. (2023). Disonansi nilai keagamaan siswa madrasah dalam ruang digital. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Kontemporer, 8(2), 115–130.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2023). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (7th ed.). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Moch. Yusron Ali, Muhammad Sajudin, Muhammad Syaiful
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
