The Relationship between Students’ Arabic Language Learning Outcomes and Their Qur’anic Memorization (Tahfiz) Ability

Authors

  • Tiara Wulan Dari Universitas Negeri Padang, Sumatera Barat
  • Halomoan Universitas Negeri Padang, Sumatera Barat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35719/adabiyah.v7i2.1364

Keywords:

Arabic language achievement, Qur’anic memorization, tahfiz ability, correlational study, Islamic education, curriculum integration, cognitive learning theory

Abstract

This study aims to examine the statistical relationship between students’ Arabic language learning outcomes and their Qur’anic memorization (tahfiz) ability in an integrated Islamic junior secondary school context. The research seeks to empirically validate the theoretical assumption that linguistic mastery, particularly semantic comprehension of Arabic, contributes to the effectiveness of Qur’anic memorization. This study employed a quantitative correlational design involving 100 ninth-grade students selected through simple random sampling from a population of 132 students. Arabic language learning outcomes were obtained from official semester examination records, while tahfiz ability was measured using a validated instrument assessing tajwid accuracy, fluency, fashahah, and recitation manners. Instrument reliability testing yielded a Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of 0.866, indicating high internal consistency. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson Product Moment correlation, and simple linear regression, preceded by normality and linearity tests. The findings indicate that Arabic learning outcomes were categorized as high (M = 97.68), whereas Qur’anic memorization ability was categorized as moderate (M = 84.58). Pearson correlation analysis revealed a positive and statistically significant relationship between Arabic achievement and tahfiz ability (r = 0.202, p = 0.044). However, the effect size was small, with Arabic learning outcomes explaining approximately 4.1 percent of the variance in memorization performance. Regression analysis confirmed that Arabic achievement positively predicts tahfiz ability. This study contributes novel empirical evidence by quantitatively examining the relationship between Arabic academic achievement and Qur’anic memorization ability at the junior secondary level within an integrated Islamic schooling framework. Unlike previous studies that primarily focus on pedagogical strategies or qualitative insights, this research statistically measures the cognitive-linguistic linkage between Arabic mastery and tahfiz performance. The study theoretically strengthens the integration of cognitive learning theory and Islamic education research by demonstrating that semantic comprehension supports memorization retention. Practically, it provides evidence-based insights for curriculum integration, suggesting that enhancing Arabic proficiency should be aligned with structured tahfiz programs, motivational reinforcement, and systematic repetition strategies to optimize memorization outcomes.

References

Ali, M. (n.d.). Bahaya mengekor non muslim: Mukhtarat Iqtidha’ ash-Shirathal Mustaqim Syaikh Ibnu Taimiyah.

Azzakiyah, L. F., & Jahro, N. D. (2024). Penguasaan bahasa Arab dan pemahaman Al-Qur’an dalam metode Tahfizh Qur’an Tematik (TQT) di MTs Khadijah Kota Malang. Indonesian Research Journal on Education, 4(3), 1487–1493.

Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380.

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2018). Applied multiple regression and correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268–294.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. L. (2018). Integrated curriculum as an effective way to teach 21st century capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 31–50.

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58.

Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), Article 00149.

Fauzi, I., & Himmah, M. A. (2022). Application of reward and punishment in tahfidz Qur’an learning. Journal of Islamic Education Research, 3(1), 69–78.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Garcia, A. R., Filipe, S. B., Fernandes, C., Estevão, C., & Ramos, G. (n.d.). Dalil dan hadis keutamaan menghafal Al-Qur’an.

Giyanti, E., & Setiadi, H. (2022). Penilaian Tahfiz Al-Qur’an: Konsep, Analisis, dan Praktik. CV Bintang Semesta Media.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hamka. (1990). Tafsir Al-Azhar (Juz 10). Pustaka Nasional PTE Ltd.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Hilmi, I., & Nurhayati, F. (2024). Pengaruh motivasi belajar terhadap prestasi pelajaran bahasa Arab. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 5(1), 870–874.

Ika Wardani, M., & Rohayah, A. (2023). Implementasi metode sima’i tahfidz Al-Qur’an dalam meningkatkan kemampuan hafalan Al-Qur’an. Turabian: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 13–22.

Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10.

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.

Maulana Putra, M. R., Mutaqqien, A., & Kholik, A. (2024). Analisis faktor yang mempengaruhi keterampilan berbicara bahasa Arab mahasiswa program studi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab. Tatsqifiy: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 5(2), 113–123.

Maulida, R. A., Sahlani, S., & Hakim, L. (2023). Hubungan kemampuan berbahasa Arab dengan kemampuan menghafal Al-Qur’an siswa kelas VIII SMP Islam Al-Mansyuriyah. Masterpiece: Journal of Islamic Studies and Social Sciences, 1(1), 24–31.

Nasution, H. S. (2017). Pengantar linguistik bahasa Arab (ed. Moh. Kholison). CV Lisan Arabi.

Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255–287.

Rodliyah, S., Khusnuridlo, M., Fauzi, I., & Baharun, H. (2024). Optimizing the quality of Islamic senior high school graduates through curriculum management of vocational programs based on pesantrens in East Java, Indonesia. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2423437.

Saepudin, S. (2012). Pembelajaran keterampilan berbahasa Arab: Teori dan aplikasi. TrustMedia Publishing.

Saleh, N., Nurhidayah, & Susiawati. (2024). Hubungan antara hafalan Al-Qur’an dengan prestasi belajar bahasa Arab siswa. Pinisi Journal of Art, Humanity & Social Studies, 4, 36–46.

Salida, A., & Zulpina, Z. (2023). Keistimewaan bahasa Arab sebagai bahasa Al-Qur’an dan ijtihadiyyah. Jurnal Sathar, 1(1), 23–33.

Salim, N. A., Zaini, M., Wahib, A., Fauzi, I., & Asnawan, A. (2024). Fostering moderate character of santri: Effective hidden curriculum strategy in Islamic boarding schools. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 357–372.

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101832.

Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-23

How to Cite

Dari, T. W., & Halomoan. (2026). The Relationship between Students’ Arabic Language Learning Outcomes and Their Qur’anic Memorization (Tahfiz) Ability. AL-ADABIYAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 7(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.35719/adabiyah.v7i2.1364