Integrating Tartili and Talaqqi Methods in Qur’anic Reading Instruction: A Qualitative Study of Junior High School Students in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35719/adabiyah.v7i4.1479Keywords:
Tartili, Talaqqi, Qur’anic Reading Instruction, Corrective Feedback, Qur’anic PedagogyAbstract
Purpose: This study explores how Tartili and Talaqqi are integrated into Qur’anic reading instruction, how students respond to these complementary practices, and what factors facilitate or constrain their implementation among Grade VIII students at an Indonesian junior high school. Method: A descriptive qualitative design was employed at SMPN 34 Padang, Indonesia. Participants comprised two Islamic Religious Education teachers and five purposively selected Grade VIII students experiencing difficulties in articulation, tajwid, reading pace, or fluency. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, direct classroom observations, and documentation. Three days of intensive observation focused on students’ recitation of Surah Al-Kafirun verses 1–6 and Surah Al-Hujurat verse 13. Data credibility was strengthened through source and methodological triangulation, while analysis followed an interactive process of data collection, reduction, display, and conclusion drawing. Main Findings: Tartili functioned primarily as structured, paced, repetitive, and rule-oriented practice, whereas Talaqqi provided direct oral modelling, individualized listening, diagnosis of specific errors, immediate corrective feedback, and targeted repetition. Students demonstrated observable short-term adjustments in articulation, tajwid, pacing, fluency, and confidence, although responses varied according to individual difficulties. Implementation was supported by adequate school facilities but constrained by limited instructional time, insufficient differentiation, overlapping teacher understanding of both methods, and unsystematic assessment. Novelty/Originality: Rather than treating Tartili and Talaqqi as interchangeable or independently effective methods, this study conceptualizes them as complementary pedagogical mechanisms linking structured practice with individualized corrective interaction. Contribution: The study offers a process-oriented framework for Qur’anic pedagogy and suggests integrating diagnostic assessment, differentiated guidance, immediate feedback, targeted repetition, and systematic follow-up to support more responsive Qur’anic reading instruction.
References
Abror, I. (2022). Metode pembelajaran Al-Qur’an: Kumpulan metode-metode belajar huruf Al-Qur’an. SUKA-Press.
Damanik, M. Z., & Nazidah, N. (2025). Strategi Al-Qur’an dalam membentuk karakter remaja Muslim. AT-Tarbiyah: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(2), 461–467.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Hidayati, N. (2021). Teori pembelajaran Al Qur’an. Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir, 4(1), 29–40.
Izzan, A., & Noviana, S. (2022). Pengaruh penerapan metode Iqro’ terhadap kelancaran membaca Al-Qur’an: Studi di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Rohmaniyah Sukawening Garut. Masagi, 1(1), 115–121.
Kurnia PS, A. M. B., & Aliah, N. D. (2021). Evaluasi pembelajaran Tartil Al-Qur’an dalam teori Tadarruj dan Tikrar Ibnu Khaldun: Studi analisis pada metode Bil Qolam di SMP Khadijah Surabaya. Al-Insyiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 7(1), 44–57.
Latifah, D., Sulistia, D., Sajiwo, B., & Ginting, A. L. B. (2023). Penerapan metode ceramah dan tanya jawab pada pembelajaran Al-Qur’an Hadis dalam memahami tujuan dan fungsi Al-Qur’an. Jurnal Generasi Tarbiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 30–39.
Luthfiyani, P. W., & Murhayati, S. (2024). Strategi memastikan keabsahan data dalam penelitian kualitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(3), 45315–45328.
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760.
O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.
Rahim, A., Muktadir, A., Jabar, F., Waluyan, P. D., & Alwan, M. M. (2023). Implementasi kemampuan membaca Al-Qur’an dengan penerapan metode Tartil pada siswa kelas V di MIN 1 Baubau. Jurnal Wawasan Sarjana, 2(1), 21–29.
Rohimah, R. B., & Ngulwiyah, I. (2023). Tren metode pembelajaran Al-Qur’an di Indonesia tahun 2019–2023: Sebuah systematic review. Jurnal Pendidikan Abad Ke-21, 1(2), 85–94.
Sai, Y. (2018). Teaching Qur’an in Irish Muslim schools: Curriculum, approaches, perspectives and implications. British Journal of Religious Education, 40(2), 148–157.
Sarnoto, A. Z., & Abnisa, A. P. (2022). Motivasi belajar dalam perspektif Al-Qur’an. Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Multikulturalisme, 4(2), 210–219.
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.
Suhayib, S., & Ansyari, M. F. (2023). Design of Islamic Religious Education: Purposes, alignment of curriculum components and contexts. British Journal of Religious Education, 45(4), 382–393.
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357.
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Melani Putri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
